Wednesday, December 13, 2006

Where the hell have I been?

My laptop suffered another failure and it has been somewhat difficult in my current hand-to-mouth existence in order to get it fixed. I hope to have it up and running by the New Year and to continue Plastic Exploding for both of you loyal fans, and to have a kitty started for a spare after that. I am just glad the damn thing is still up after all this time.

Friday, June 30, 2006

Richard Kern, again

Folks who read my post about the films of R. Kern are directed to this page at the wonderful archive of avant-garde culture Ubu Web: two films by Kern, My Nightmare and Thrust In Me are available there for download, along with other material by Nick Zedd, Jon Moritsugu, Tessa Hughes-Freeland, and others, and also a manifesto of the "Cinema of Transgression" by Zedd. The films are in .avi (xvid) format and range from about 3mb to over 260 mb.

The Yellow Teddybears (1963)


Salvation Films, a UK-based video company specializing in cult films, releases British exploitation films under their "Jezebel" imprint with the tagline "Sexy Retro from the Saucy Seventies," attempting to evoke freewheeling, mod visions of Swinging Britain through colorful, retro package design and hot-cha-cha copy, however, the films included on their Sex-a-Go-Go 3-DVD set, all made before the seventies, suggest at the very least that exploitation in Britain took awhile before finally hitting its stride (at least in comparison with the trailers for other, later films the set includes on the discs). None of the films on this set are truly memorable, but all have their interest: the latest film on the set to appear, 1969's Zeta One, an improbable spoof of both sci-fi and spy films, is the film that shows the most skin (and some endearingly cheesy costuming and set design) and features a performance by Charles Hawtrey, the comedian best known for his work in the low-brow, Benny-Hill-esque Carry On films; while Secrets of a Windmill Girl (1966) began life as an attempt by producers Tony Tenser and Michael Klinger, who, as the Compton Cinema Group, had acquired London's Windmill Theatre (from the thirties to the sixties a London institution with its distinctive brand of spicy variety theatrical programs), to document the Windmill "revudeville" shows and ended as the story of a dancer's rise and fall from Windmill girl to stripper, and featured an early performance by Pauline Collins, an actress who later established herself (and received an OBE) through prestigious television and Broadway performances. Earliest, lowest on the meter in terms of salaciousness, and to my mind the most interesting is 1963's The Yellow Teddybears, the focus of today's discussion.

Painfully earnest and preachy (and -- unless we are talking about a "Continental" version of this film which also circulated for a while that featured spliced-in scenes with completely different actors -- without nudity or really any suggestive content) the film is a drama about premarital sex among teenage girls who go to a particular suburban school. The title refers to small teddy-bears which are worn by a clique of girls at the school, the significance of which is inadvertently found out by their biology teacher (Jacqueline Ellis): only girls who have slept with a boy may join the club and wear the insignia. Only a few years out of university herself and also sexually experienced, she is shocked, not because these girls are having sex, but because they are having sex for the wrong reasons, and she confronts them in class for using sexuality for competitive and status purposes instead of its deeper and more personal significances. Meanwhile, one of the "teddybears," Annette Whitley, has been keeping her pregnancy a secret, and when her attempt to obtain an abortion is discovered by her father, she runs away to London, and her enraged father blames the school for corrupting his daughter's morals.

The final scene which unfolds from this development lays the film's agenda out on the table for you, as Ellis is called to a meeting with the headmistress and the board of governors of the school for her remarks to the Teddybears, and the scene is a veritable kangaroo court of the forces of hypocrisy, respectability, and repression versus Ellis's honesty, understanding and candor, as her frank admission of having had sexual intercourse before marriage (with, it is implied here, her fiance who is a drawing teacher at the school), which was made to the girls as part of her advice against promiscuity, is inflated into charges of corrupting morals by a group of self-righteous characters obsessed with what effect this scandal might have on the school. Meanwhile a subplot concerns Whitley's classmate (Georgina Patterson) who, having sat in the bedroom with her boyfriend while he sleeps off too much drink at a party, is then mistakenly considered to have qualified for the wearing of a teddybear.

As it happens, I watched this film as the US Food and Drug Andiminstration approved a new vaccine for human papilloma virus (HPV), a sexually-transmitted disease which can lead to cervical cancer. The requirement that the drug be administered to girls before they are sexually active has occasioned a furor among parents and religious groups who are worried that inoculation against a disease that leads to some 4000 deaths a year from cancer be construed to make premarital sex seem "okay." It is a little depressing waching this film and noticing that the attitudes it shows -- that sex before marriage is some sort of taboo which must be enforced by ignorance and vulnerability to negative consequences -- are still with us today. The point that social pressure to be sexually attractive and active must be met by a response more compassionate than rigid repression allows is impassionedly made by Ellis to the governors, who present a wall of hostility, arrogance, and superiority: "You ask for charity, we ask for chastity," says one of them, a smarmy lawyer played by Raymond Huntley. Meanwhile, Whiteley, last seen hitching a ride with a creepy, randy young truckdriver on her way to an uncertain future in London, is deemed not of great importance to the school's governors, since she has left the school and the district; the possibility of scandal besmirching respectability trumping any compassionate considerations.

Director Robert Hartford-Davis never made much of a name for himself as a director, going on to make a number of other exploitation films before going to America where he directed television before passing away in the late seventies.

Monday, June 05, 2006

Gate of Flesh (1964)

The 1960s and '70s were a fertile period for genre cinema in Japan: they impress me in much the same way as Hong Kong film of the eighties and nineties do with their combination of freewheeling creativity, style, and exploitation values, and probably no other filmmaker of the period did it as distinctively as Seijun Suzuki. He began making films at the Nikkatsu studios in the fifties but hit his full stride in the early to mid-sixties. They seem weird and arty today, with lots of bright color, weird visual flourishes and a cocktail-lounge cool, but art was the last thing on Suzuki's mind when he made them. To this day Suzuki maintains that he was not motivated by visual aesthetics or symbolism, or even a particular passion for film: it was just his job. He was a B-movie director, he will say, who worked on projects assigned by the studio, projects destined for the second-feature slot on the triple-feature programs which were standard in Japanese moviehouses at the time. Nevertheless, no one made pictures quite like Suzuki, and his influence is seen all over in Japanese exploitation film.

Gate of Flesh (Nikutai no mon, 1964) was my introduction to Suzuki's work, a melodrama set in postwar Tokyo during the early months of the Allied occupation, a time when devastation and poverty are everywhere and where survival is the main preoccupation. Maya (Yumiko Nogawa), a girl who has come from the countryside looking for work, joins a group of prostitutes: in exchange for their protection, she must abide by their code of conduct, rule number one being never to sleep with a man for free. Girls who break this rule are severely and brutally punished before being turned out to fend for themselves. Into this tight-knit group comes Shin (Jo Shishido), ex-soldier and petty criminal, wounded and on the run from the Allied MPs after stabbing a GI, and his guts and charisma prove attractive to all the girls, provoking infatuation and then dissension: when Maya finally sleeps with Shin, the others turn on them both, drumming Maya out of the group and betraying Shin to the local yakuza.

Gate of Flesh was based on a novel by Tajiro Tamura which was originally filmed in 1949 and has been filmed again twice since Suzuki's version. This was intended as a vehicle for Jo Shishido, a star who was a major box-office draw and one of the more out-there of Nikkatsu's tough-guy leads, and who worked with Suzuki on a number of films and always seemed to have a handle on what Suzuki was doing. Charismatic and tough in a very Japanese way (it's been my observation that just about every culture seems to have its own distinctive flavor of tough guy, at least as far as film is concerned), Shishido had a distinctive face (thanks in large part to cosmetic surgery early in his film career), a sonorous baritone and a crazy fire in his eyes that made him ideal for heavies and especially anti-heroes. As good as he is in this film, it is Nogawa who shines in this torrid and often bitter film as her character is whipped through all sorts of extreme emotions and appears to grow up before the viewer's eyes from a hungry, frightened and childlike newcomer to a coy and flirty teenager to the heartbreak and suffering of adulthood. Misako Tominaga is also noteworthy as an older member of the group who does not share the girls' dress, aggressive "American" manners, or their simplistic view of men and sex as a meal ticket.

The strongly drawn characters make for torrid drama, but Gate of Flesh is also memorable for its expressionistic visuals, its bitter and angry view of Japan's defeat in the war, and its pioneering venture into "pink" or softcore sexual content. Much of the Suzuki look has to do with longtime collaborator Takeo Kimura, who did production design for many of Suzuki's films, and much of it also has to do with the low budgets Suzuki had for his projects and the ways Suzuki and Kimura devised to get the most out of those budgets. Postwar rebuilding had eliminated most if not all traces of the devastation of the war, leaving no suitable locations, so a set was built from a warehouseful of scrap lumber being stored on Nikkatsu's lot, using labor that was recorded as routine cleaning and maintenance. Much has been made of the "symbolic" meaning of the color coordinated outfits, a color for each character, that Maya and her fellow hookers wear, but the main purpose of single colors was simply to distinguish them from the other hookers in the neighborhood, and it led to my favorite sequence when each of the girls shares her private thoughts about Shin in settings that match their outfits and have almost no continuity with the rest of their surroundings. Also, superimposition is used to show characters' points of view and reactions, as when a closeup of Nogawa's face, both anguished and ecstatic, is superimposed over Tominaga's punishment for her liaison with a mild-mannered schoolteacher.

Gate of Flesh's view of the aftermath of the war from the perspective of the Japanese is also interesting because it differs so much from the way we especially in the US have been taught about the Occupation. In 1964, anyone old enough to attend this film would probably have had some vivid memories of the period: its hardship and poverty, and the humiliation of living under the boot of foreigners. Suzuki himself had been called up towards the end of the war, and his own wartime memories were of retreating from the Phillippines and being shipwrecked after American fighters bombed his ship, and he has recalled candidly that his own view of the Americans at the time he made Gate of Flesh was less than positive for just this reason, and the sadness, bitterness, and anger of defeat hangs over the film like a cloud. Tominaga's character is a widow who lost her husband in the war, and Maya's brother was lost in Borneo, and Shin is a constant reminder to them both. For his part, Shin is cynical about politics, as are all the characters; they have the point of view of people whose lives have been up-ended by war, and who have little time for arguing over politics. The most moving passage of the movie on the topic of the war is when Shin and the girls get drunk together and Shin, his head shrouded by a rising sun flag covered with the names of his comrades, sings a soldier's song which fades into quiet weeping, and this flag figures in the end of the film, floating in the gutter, as the camera moves up and takes a long shot of the city and the Stars and Stripes flying in the distance.

Finally, Gate of Flesh is notable as a harbinger of what would eventually become a staple of Japanese genre film: sex. While small indie producers and distributors were already making softcore adult films, Gate of Flesh was reportedly the first major-studio film to go in the adult softcore direction with its nudity and disturbingly sadistic punishment scenes, scenes that even today will not sit well with many viewers, especially in the West. Japanese genre cinema would go further in the ensuing decades, and here we see the beginnings of what would become a major trend: nudity and themes of obsession, perversion and misogyny, which is hard to justify on moral or social grounds but also puts the "sex-obsessed" Western media in some perspective.

Sunday, June 04, 2006

Richard Kern



In the eighties, when the feminist critique of sex and violence in the media was making headlines and gaining adherents on both the left and the right, "transgressive" and "confrontational" were the mantras for any artist working for "underground" cred, and New York City filmmaker Richard Kern made a reputation with no-budget Super-8 shorts full of violence, eroticism, gore, sleaze, and black comedy. In making these shorts Kern had the help of some very high-profile names on the cutting edge of the music and art community at the time: Lydia Lunch, Henry Rollins, David Wojnarowicz, Karen Finley, J. G. Thirlwell (probably better known as Foetus), the Butthole Surfers, Sonic Youth, Clint Ruin, and Nick Zedd were some of the people who appeared in or contributed music to Kern's films. Film Threat put out a collection of these films on a two volume VHS edition called Hardcore, and lately I picked up a double sided DVD from Third Wave Media called The Hardcore Collection: The Films of Richard Kern.

Kern's films are painted with a large brush and indulge just a little too enthusiastically in shock to be quite disturbing. Kern takes pleasure in flaunting taboos and engineering collisions of sexy and violent images, but does not, with the exceptions of The Right Side Of My Brain (1985) and Fingered (1986), which were both scripted by Lydia Lunch, go seriously into problems or issues, but stays mainly in a sort of neo-exploitation groove. The two Lunch collaborations explore her ambivalent attraction to -- and repulsion from -- male violence. The Right Side Of My Brain is narrated by Lunch while she appears in fantasy sequences with various ominous-looking men, before she in turn dominates another woman (and, yep, that tattooed guy there is indeed Henry Rollins). Fingered is a tale of Lunch and her psycho boyfriend on the road on a sort of punk-Starkweather rampage, sparked by the guy's jealousy and his penchant for spontaneous violence, with Lunch's character eventually becoming herself brutalized and brutalizing by the end of the film. These are also probably Kern's best films. The balance of Kern's work is rather spotty, with a collection of shorter films, Manhattan Love Suicides, showing some odd little stories, such as a grimacing man following a middle-aged artist home and who spontaneously loses an arm and busts open a jugular when he doesn't get attention, in "Stray Dogs." You Killed Me First, with David Wojnarowicz and Karen Finley as the uptight parents of a misunderstood, rebellious daughter played by Lung Leg, a frequent Kern player, is a hilarious black comedy. Other films, like Submit To Me (1986) and Submit To Me Now (1987), are sorts of post-punk stag film which string together a lot of sexual and violent images with little concern for structure or theme, or the filmmaker indulging his interest in various kinks, which have a sort of peep-show charm to them, if you enjoy that sort of thing. The Evil Cameraman (1986) and My Nightmare (1993) are digs at Kern himself as a pervy filmmaker who gets rebuffed by women who come to his shoots.

In essence, Kern's aesthetic in these films is little removed from that of the kid who takes the opportunity of getting his friends together to make as wild a film as he can while his parents are away, which makes his work look more energetic and surprisingly less nihilistic over time. In time and in general tenor of material, he has a lot in common with "transgressive" underground artists and musicians like Genesis P-Orridge and G. G. Allin, without the pompous baggage that often went along with their work. In recent years Kern has been working mostly as a photographer, continuing a fascination with eroticism and voyeurism but in a lighter vein than at the time he made these films, but his films have had some influence, mainly on the fringes on the culture where art, porn, and the underground meet, as on the popular website Suicide Girls and their punk-meets-pinup aesthetic, and in the films of Bruce LaBruce, an underground filmmaker based in Toronto, who paid homage to Kern in his Super 8 1/2 with a cameo by Kern and a parody called Submit To My Finger.

BRUSH WITH GREATNESS? Lung Leg was one of Kern's more frequently-appearing performers, both as model and in speaking roles, and her presence in these films is hard to forget. Fragile and gangly in appearance, she looked hurt and vulnerable, but also tough and, above all, full of rage. Her presence embodied the "punk" attitude in Kern's films probably even better than Lydia Lunch's appearances. Lung Leg also appeared on the cover of Sonic Youth's album Evol in a photo taken by Kern at the time when Kern and the band were collaborating. When I saw these films for the first time about five years ago, I discussed them with my friend Susan and she told me that Lung Leg actually lived here in Minneapolis for awhile, which made me remember when I worked for a Kinko's on Lake and Hennepin some years ago and had some encounters with a woman who occasionally came in to make copies. She was pale, mostly dressed in black, with dark hair, cat-eye glasses, and dark lipstick which always seemed to be smeared. As a customer I remember her as somewhat curt and antisocial. I also seem to remember her waiting for buses in the neighborhood. I never learned her name or met her socially, and it was only years later, after having seen these films and discussed them with Susan that I began to wonder whether this mystery woman might not have been Lung Leg. If so, what brought her to Minneapolis? Did underground film fans recognize her on the street? What did she think of the films she made with Kern? After a few encounters, I never saw her again, and I don't think these questions will ever be answered.

Wednesday, April 26, 2006

Last Hero in China (1993)


After three installments of Tsui Hark's Once Upon a Time in China films, star Jet Li left the series, apparently due to disputes with Tsui and his production company Film Workshop, and promptly turned around and played the character he played in the OUATIC series, Wong Fei-hung, for Wong Jing's Workshop. This struck me a little as being like Christopher Reeve playing Superman for a lower-budget studio, but the parallel does not quite stick. Wong Fei-hung is not a proprietary fictional character, but a man who lived in the late Qing and early Republican eras in southern China, a practitioner of Chinese medicine and teacher of Hung Gar kung fu whose reputation as a nationalist folk-hero blossomed after his death in 1924, first through serialized novels and, starting in the late forties, on the silver screen. Wong is the most durable and beloved hero in Hong Kong martial arts cinema, and is also possibly world cinema's most filmed character: Kwan Tak-hing, the movies' first Wong, played him in nearly a hundred films during his career, though Western viewers probably are more familiar with Jackie Chan's revisionist take on the character in the Drunken Master series.

As the Spielberg of Hong Kong cinema, Tsui Hark brought Wong and the martial arts film into the age of big-budget blockbusters with the OUATIC series, showing Wong Fei-hung battling corrupt Qing dynasty officials, foreign profiteers and spies, and nativist fanatics while confronting the changes sweeping China at the time: Western influence, technology, manners, and ideals, and considering how these changes would affect the Chinese national character. Wong Jing is in many respects at the opposite end of the spectrum from Tsui, a screenwriter, producer and director whose taste for unabashed exploitation has earned him friends and enemies the world over, and 1993's Last Hero In China is not nearly as ambitious or as lavish as the films it apes. Jet Li played Wong Fei-hung for Tsui as a relatively youthful but serious man, full of Confucian gravity and sternness, and for Wong Jing he does essentially the same, while adapting the hero subtly to Wong's predilections for over-the-top humor and silliness.

As the film opens, Wong is looking for a new place for his clinic, Po Chi Lam, as students and patients fill the old place to bursting and a notice of a three-fold rent hike comes in. His two senior students, the doughty Foon (Leung Ka-yan) and buck-toothed So (Dicky Cheung), arrange for a spacious new building for the clinic with a man who happens to have the given name Wong Sifu, who admires Wong and would like to learn kung fu with him. Unfortunately, this admiring "Mass Tar Wong" is a brothel-keeper whose establishment, to Wong Fei-hung's embarrassment, is next door to the new Po Chi Lam. But this is the least of Wong Fei-hung's worries, as a heretical sect of monks, with the aid of a local Qing official (Chai Ngong-kau) who is actually a plant loyal to the rebellious nativist Boxer association, kidnap women and traffick them to Southeast Asia to benefit the Boxers, and children are being deafened by a poisonous patent medicine marketed by unscrupulous Westerners.

It isn't necessary to be familiar with the OUATIC series to enjoy this film, but it helps. As tongue in cheek as the OUATIC series was earnest, Last Hero In China, part knock-off, part parody, has fun with the corrupt Qing officials, profiteering Westerners, and nativist fanatics of the series, as well as Wong's upright, almost priggish character and the familiar Wong Fei-hung theme (originally a Cantonese traditional song, developed into a stirring anthem for the series), and especially Wong's famous mastery of the acrobatic spectacle, the Lion Dance: having been humiliated in a Lion Dance competition not by another lion, but by a group led by Qing Legate Officer Lui (played with Simon Legree-ish gusto by Chai Gnong-kau) dressed as a giant fire-breathing centipede and deafened by accidental ingestion of a poisonous Western patent medicine, he escapes to the country to regroup and attempt a cure for his deafness. Inspired by watching a chicken in a farmyard catching bugs, he returns for the most memorable set-piece of the film, defeating the centipede with his new Rooster Style of kung fu complete with wings, claws and beak (the Chinese title of the film is more or less literally "Wong Fei-hung's Iron Rooster Vs. Centipede").

Most of my initial exposure to Jet Li's work has been in his more or less straight-ahead action-hero roles (the OUATIC series, Bodyguard from Beijing, High Risk), roles which displayed his athletic talents but were often weak on characterization. He is capable of a boyish charm when he wants to display it, but he often comes across as being impatient with frivolity. Fortunately, I am beginning to discover the lighter side of Li, and the rooster scene, which segues into a final "drunken boxing" throwdown with Chai Ngong-kau, is a wonderful send-up which he plays to the hilt. As I go through my DVD collection, you can probably expect to read more about Li's lighter side here.

Last Hero in China does not pretend to have the resources available to Tsui in his series, and the film looks it, with the lack of lavish sets covered with that ubiquitous early-nineties style of lower-budget filmmaking consisting of wide-angle, fast-moving camerawork, saturated color and expressionistic lighting. The film does have a number of well-known names in the supporting roles: Anita Yuen plays one of Pimp Wong's girls, with Cheung Man as a young woman from the north who has come to Canton in search of her lost sister, and Gordon Liu Chia-hui as head of the monks. Action direction is provided by Yuen Woo-ping, whose penchant for wirework is given full rein here, giving the action scenes an over-the-top quality in keeping with the general madcap tenor of the film.

Tuesday, April 04, 2006

My Father, Harlan (1936-2006)

My father Harlan passed away on March 21, 2006, at the age of 69. He had recently been moved to a nursing home after an automobile accident in January in which both his legs and his ribcage were broken and his shoulder was badly damaged. Though stable enough to be moved to a nursing home, he was in a weakened state and was vulnerable to bloodclots and strokes, and he had a very long period of limited mobility and dependence on caregivers to look forward to. Many people who are seriously ill "give up" at a certain point when they feel that further life will be a burden to them, and I think that that might have been the case with my father, whose independence was very important to him. Consequently his death was not quite a surprise when my brother called and told me.

My brother arranged for the memorial March 30 at Patrick's, a bar in my hometown of St. Peter, Minnesota that was a constant haunt of Harlan's, and where he had assembled a group of friends who were loyal and loving. He had a reputation as a "geezer," a colorful and garrulous eccentric. He was a member of the "mug club" at Patrick's, which meant that a beer mug was kept there for his use, and this held his ashes while my brother made some prepared remarks and some of his friends told stories and shared reminiscences. My brother is a practitioner of Asatru, a heathen spirituality based on Norse mythology, and he performed a couple of Asatru-style toasts with homemade honey mead supplied by one of his friends, and general socializing followed. It was an unconventional and informal and a not at all emotionally demanding sort of funeral, and it all went very well. The mead was very good too: strong but with a delicate champagney flavor. I had not been close to my father for many years, for reasons that are rather personal, confusing and complicated, and while for all my adult life I found him difficult to tolerate and it was easier to simply disconnect from him and live my own life, I was often nagged by guilt for this, and it was heartening that he had his friends and his own de facto family, who were as close to him as any blood relations. The feelings for my father were real and profound as we said goodbye to him together.

Harlan was remembered by his friends and family especially for his hammy, performance-oriented streak. He had more or less appropriated Hal Holbrook's performances in the role of Mark Twain and performed this material a number of times for family gatherings and in a couple of small venues, and people appreciated these performances as though he had created the role himself. A video of one of these performances was played at the gathering, and a copy of a flyer and a newspaper clipping displayed. I was always slightly embarrassed about the Mark Twain thing, especially the fact that it was essentially plagiarism, but his peers found his turns as Twain entertaining, and they were clearly not being judgemental on theatrical or artistic terms.

My father was a talker, a drinker, a reader and collector of music. At one point he studied for the Lutheran ministry, but his faith lapsed and he worked a strange succession of jobs, including stints as a stagehand in Lake Tahoe (where my brother and I were born) and a disc jockey in South Dakota before the State of Minnesota, through a scheme of services for the blind (he had lifelong vision problems and was legally blind) got him started in a small business running a canteen in the Security Hospital in St. Peter, where my mother, who passed away five years ago, also worked as a nurse. Harlan was a man of varied and eclectic tastes in music and books: his record collection included what might be called "belly-dance" music, Bo Diddley, Chuck Berry, country music, bluegrass, a sprinkling of jazz and an assortment of other odds and ends. He liked nineteenth-century novels, history, Sherlock Holmes, movie Westerns, old radio programs, and old comedy. On occasion, he experimented with musical instruments: at various times, he owned a concertina, a banjo, a mandolin, a Dobro (a guitar with a metal resonator played with a steel), and an electronic keyboard from Radio Shack. He was not a disciplined individual, and tended to abandon these when they got too difficult. He also had a couple of pets while I was growing up, a small bad-tempered parrot named Percy and a very large, very timid and possibly not terribly intelligent dog, a mastiff named Guenevere, who I usually just called Gwenny, and who was, to her befuddlement, constantly being scolded for any misbehavior by the senior dog of the family, a mutt half her size named Tina.

My own problems with my father tended to do with his drinking and also his often rather bitter views of life. He was a great talker but a less good listener, and there was a deep and abiding sadness underneath the jokes and irreverence. I thought of him as a deeply wounded man who spent his life nursing his wounds without healing them. Many of my own flaws, as well as my strengths, I inherited from my father, and from a young age I found the darker side of his character terrifying, though not in any physical sense. He was a sensitive man from a rural working class background and he must have felt the loneliness of being an outsider in such an environment early, and I occasionally caught glimpses of his hurt, anger, and wounded pride, glimpses of what I feared I would not be able to escape myself. I shut myself off from him after a couple of alcohol-fueled scenes upset me terribly as a teenager, scenes that resulted in my parents being separated, and finally divorced. As I became older, I felt guilty at feeling I had to escape from him without being able to find it in myself to initiate any sort of reconciliation. Such reconciliation would have most likely meant, my father being the stubborn man he was, that I would have been obliged to bury, regardless of the cost to me emotionally, the real hurts of the past. Now that he is gone, the possibility for reconciliation on any terms is lost, and I am deeply sorry for that. No doubt I was not terribly fair to him myself in all this, and I regret that too.

In our home there were always books and records, and we were always free to browse them: Harlan was not what I would call an intellectual, but it was clear that culture was not a dirty word and that it was always okay to explore new ideas. Neither he nor my mother felt that their jobs as parents were to program us with preconceptions, and they did not attempt to limit our intellectual or spiritual curiosities. While they would worry about our progress in school, they were not concerned about engineering our lives into conventional paths if we did not wish to follow them. More than the parents of most of my peers, they respected us as individuals, and my brother and I are grateful that they did.

I come from a stoic Scandinavian family where the nursing of grudges and open feuding is not considered proper. Not all the things I have to say about my father are good, and out of consideration for them I am not giving his full name here, though I would much like to, since there will be no grave, no tombstone; he asked that his ashes be scattered on the farm in northern Iowa where he grew up, and as flawed an individual as he was, as we all are, he deserves to have his name somewhere, so that people may remember. I hope that my family will understand that I cannot remember my father properly, or grieve him, or forgive him, if I leave his faults, which were too much a factor in our relationship to be ignored, out of account. In me there is not only love and grief for him, but also anger, guilt, embarrassment, regret, pity, annoyance and fear, and those cannot simply be buried. Even though I loved my father often without liking him, the loss of a parent is like the loss of a moon in the sky: life is changed in a profound way without his presence.

My father was a kind, sad, often silly, eccentric and proud man who loved his children. He will be missed. My thanks to all who expressed their good wishes to me and my brother at his passing.

In other news: There are a few people out there who know about this blog that I started and have probably been frustrated that there hasn't been much added to it. My energy hasn't been very high over the past few months, and perhaps the spring will bring more activity. I have been going through my DVD collection, and I will be posting some notes about some of these films in the near future.